Sometimes, a good documentary is all about being in the right place at
the right time. It does not get much better for Kim Bartley and Donnacha
O'Briain, who, in late 2001 began filming a documentary about Hugo Chavez,
the controversial President of Venezuela. As they worked on their documentary,
events in Venezuela reached a fever pitch and the duo was able to capture
on film a coup from the perspective of the Chavez government. The footage
is remarkable, especially given that actual events were so clouded by
propaganda on both sides. What is clear is that this was a coup orchestrated
with the crucial help of the media. Without their support, it would not
have been successful.
Venezuela occupies a unique political place, especially for the United
States. It is one of the largest oil producers in the world, and not located
in the Middle East. The US views it as a strategic partner, able to serve
as a counterpoint to some of its fellow OPEC members. It's also a poor
country, with oil a major source of revenue. Chavez came to power democratically
promising to redistribute the oil profits, understandably making the oil
companies, supposedly under control of the State, nervous. Chavez was
a huge proponent of education, and printed thousands of copies of the
Venezuelan constitution and encouraged citizens to study and understand
it. In late 1991, Chavez decided to act on his promise to redistribute
oil wealth, throwing his country into turmoil.
Venezuela had one state controlled television station, and nearly ten
others controlled by various media corporations, all of whom vehemently
opposed him. Bartley and O'Briain originally intended to make this a documentary
about Chavez himself, who portrays himself as something of a savior. They
got too close to him, and it is very obvious they are on his side, at
least in terms of the coup. Nevertheless, with some of the evidence they
present, it's hard not to believe them. Chavez's decision made the US
extremely nervous. A shift in power of oil control within the country
meant uncertainty, something that's never good especially when dealing
with a commodity like oil. The media portrayed Chavez as unstable, resulting
in a huge rally that eventually led to Chavez's headquarters. Shooting
erupted, which the media blamed on Chavez supporters. The army came in,
and a coup ousted Chavez. The media continually played footage of Chavez
supporters firing, supposedly into crowds of anti-Chavez citizens, yet
Bartley and O'Briain obtained spectacularly damning footage shot from
a different angle that shows empty streets below them.
With the army in charge, Chavez's cabinet was dissolved, and they lost
control of state run television. The world was told by the new President,
Pedro Carmona, that it was a popular and democratic uprising, but the
documentary posits otherwise. It's pretty convincing material. Some believe
that the coup was orchestrated with the help of the CIA, to ensure that
oil would flow continuous and cheap to the United States. There is footage
of various US officials expressing concern over the events, and footage
of ex-White House spokesman Ari Fleischer echoing Camona's assertion that
this was not a coup. Events over the next two days would call this into
question, as the Venezuelan government undergoes another upheaval. What
happens is so quick and amazing that it feels like something dreamed up
in a political thriller, but it actually happened, and was captured on
film. The difference with this film is that the filmmakers were, in essence,
trapped inside with the Chavez government, so they were able to get a
wholly different viewpoint on the explosive situation. Chavez the person
still remains elusive, as there is only one segment where he addresses
the camera and talks about his personal history. The only real shame in
all this is that this documentary is so short. With so much footage, there
was surely more that was available.
|